Course1

AI in the Workplace: Issues and Risks for Employers

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  TBD

AI in the Workplace: Issues and Risks for Employers Artificial intelligence is transforming the workplace, but it also presents legal risks and challenges for employers. This session examines the implications of AI in hiring, performance monitoring, and decision-making, focusing on compliance with employment laws and avoiding discrimination claims. Gain the tools you need to advise clients on integrating AI into their workplace practices. Highlights: Legal implications of using AI in hiring and employment decisions. Avoiding discrimination claims under Title VII and ADA. The role of transparency and fairness in AI-driven processes. Navigating employee privacy concerns in an AI-powered workplace. Case studies highlighting risks and emerging best practices.   Speakers: TBD         Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/29/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Attorneys Are Not Accomplices: How to Avoid Crossing the Line from Counselor to Co-Conspirator

$50.00
  • Instructor(s):  Sean Carter

Attorneys Are Not Accomplices: How to Avoid Crossing the Line from Counselor to Co-Conspirator In their efforts to provide the best possible service to their clients, lawyers sometimes forget that they owe an even greater duty of fidelity to the law and the proper administration of justice. As a result, lawyers who "pull out all the stops" for a client run the risk of putting a stop to their law careers and even their very freedom.  In this surprisingly funny webinar, legal humorist Sean Carter will use real-life disciplinary cases to demonstrate the myriad of ways in which lawyers have gone from counselor to co-conspirator in their efforts to serve the client. And even when lawyers don't run afoul of the criminal law and serve jail time, they are often forced to serve suspensions from the practice of law for ethical lapses involving: Assisting in client fraud Bribing judges, public officials and witnesses Fabricating, altering and deleting evidence Harboring fugitives Hiding their assets Lying for friends Providing unethical advice Smuggling contraband into jail for clients Suborning perjury Taking untenable legal positions   SPEAKER:  Sean Carter is a Harvard Law grad, who spent a decade practicing securities law before leaving the practice of law to pursue a career as the country's foremost Humorist at Law.Since then, Mr. Carter has crisscrossed the country delivering comedic professional educational seminars for more than 350 legal organizations in three dozen states. His presentation topics run the gamut from legal ethics to stress management to diversity. Yet, all of his presentations have one thing in common -- humor and plenty of it.In fact, in 2003, Mr. Carter was dubbed "America's Funniest Lawyer" by The Radio and Television Interview Report.Finally, Sean lives in Mesa, Arizona with his wife and four sons.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials. 

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/22/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Clarence Darrow: Crimes, Causes, and the Courtroom

$169.00
  • Instructor(s):  Graham Thatcher, Anna Marie Thatcher, Brian Guthrie, Charles Abourezk, Alicia Garcia, John Stuart, Barry Vickrey

Clarence Darrow: Crimes, Causes, and the Courtroom A master of the courtroom stage, who possessed an uncanny understanding of human character, Clarence Darrow was arguably the greatest trial lawyer of the twentieth century. He was an adamant opponent of capital punishment and a passionate proponent of civil and human rights. Often called the "Attorney for the Damned," he fought for the underdog and took on criminal cases thought to be hopeless. Yet, while commanding respect as a trial lawyer, Darrow was often embroiled in bitter controversy for his unpopular stands on many issues and criticized for his purported unethical professional behavior. This spellbinding and realistic character portrait of Darrow portrays his deeply held beliefs and hard-fought courtroom battles. Replete with humor, humanity and intense courtroom drama, the movie engages attendees in four of the great defense lawyer' s most famous cases between 1910 and 1928: Loeb and Leopold, Henry Sweet, the McNamara Brothers bombing of the LA Times Building and the Scopes "Monkey Trial." Using Darrow's own thoughts and courtroom summations, the movie explores timeless social, legal and ethical issues and provides a fresh and engaging tool to facilitate discussion of ethical behavior in and out of the courtroom. Throughout the webinar, this presentation deals with issues relating to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, including:         Preamble: A Lawyer's Responsibilities         Rule 1.2:     Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Lawyer and Client         Rule 1.6:     Confidentiality         Rule 1.7:     Conflict of Interest:  General Rule         Rule 1.13:   Organizational Clients         Rule 2.1:     Advisor         Rule 3.5:     Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal         Rule 5.1:     Responsibilities of a Partner, Managing Lawyer or Supervisory Lawyer         Rule 5.2:     Responsibilities of a Subordinate Lawyer                          Rule 5.3:     Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants         Rule 8.3:     Reporting Professional Misconduct       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials. 

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 195
    Min.
  • 5/14/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Cross Discipline: Building Cross-Examination Skills with Practical Improv Techniques

$99.00
  • Instructor(s):  Roger J. Dodd

Cross Discipline: Building Cross-Examination Skills with Practical Improv Techniques Professional improv actor and teacher, Steve Hohman, and legendary author and trial lawyer, Roger J. Dodd, connect the disciplines of cross-examination and improvisation. This engaging and innovative 90-minute video takes you through easy-to-follow strategies for the courtroom and introduces practical improvisational acting skills to help master Dodd's world-famous cross-examination techniques. You'll learn easy-to-use exercises to practice outside the courtroom that directly apply to trial lawyers because, just like in improv, nothing in the courtroom is scripted. AGENDA: Intro to Cross Examination and Improvisational Acting: Basic Similarities Leading Questions and One-Fact-at-a-time to Build Your Narrative Clearly Storytelling from General to the Specific General-to-Specific Takeaway and Advanced Rules of Cross (Narrative Driven and Facts, Not Conclusions) The Importance of Word-Selection, Takeaway, and Spontaneous Loop “Yes, And”, “Spontaneous Loops” Takeaway, and Active Listening   SPEAKER:  Roger J. Dodd has active offices in Park City, Utah (Dodd & Kuendig), Valdosta, Georgia (Dodd and Burnham), and Jacksonville, Florida (Spohrer and Dodd) where he practices trial work of all types. This includes personal injury, wrongful death, criminal defense, and domestic relations. He has been listed in Best Lawyers for more than 20 years. He is one of a handful of lawyers nationally who are listed in Super Lawyers in more than one state simultaneously (Georgia, Florida and Mountain States (5). He was Board Certified by the National Board of Trial Advocacy in Civil Trial Practice for more than 20 years and was a Board Certified in Criminal Trial Practice for more than 20 years. He acts as co-counsel all over the United States and in select foreign countries. He also coaches individual lawyers in individual cases. He has lectured and taught lawyers and judges in all 50 states, and multiple foreign countries. TV and legal credits include CourtTV, TruTV, CNN, ABC, CBS, and cable TV.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.  

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 92
    Min.
  • 5/30/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Demand Letters That Deliver: Drafting for Impact

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  Shannon M. Bell

Demand Letters That Deliver: Drafting for Impact Demand letters may seem like they’re merely hammer-strokes, the first blow of litigation. LI But the most effective demand letters are more subtly crafted.  Tone is important.  Vitriolic letters – letters that do not keep a client’s goals in mind and misjudge the reader’s range of likely reactions – may be counterproductive.  Rather than moving the process toward a good outcome, the letter may actually result in setbacks and greater costs.  There’s a subtle balance between precision and vagueness, stimulating favorable response by being sufficiently vague so that the reader speculates about adverse consequences. There’s also the issue of how much of your case – favorable facts and persuasive law – to include in the letter. This program will provide you with a real-world guide to setting goals and carefully crafted demand letters to advance client goals. Setting goals and realistic expectations Striking the right tone – how aggressive is too aggressive? Precision v. vagueness - leaving room for speculation and negotiation How much of your case – the facts and the law – to include in the letter? Common traps and mistakes in demand letters   Speaker:  Shannon M. Bell is a member with Kelly Law Partners, LLC, where she litigates a wide variety of complex business disputes, construction disputes, fiduciary claims, employment issues, and landlord/tenant issues.  Her construction experience extends from contract negotiations to defense of construction claims of owners, HOAs, contractors and tradesmen.  She also represents clients in claims of shareholder and officer liability, piercing the corporate veil, and derivative actions.  She writes and speaks on commercial litigation, employment, discovery and bankruptcy topics       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/13/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Don't Be A Stupid Cupid: Avoiding Inappropriate Entanglements in the Practice of Law

$50.00
  • Instructor(s):  Sean Carter

Don't Be A Stupid Cupid: Avoiding Inappropriate Entanglements in the Practice of Law One of the most fundamental duties that we owe our clients is the duty to provide them with loyal and independent representation. In other words, we are duty bound to put their interests first and to avoid conflicts of interest; something that becomes increasingly difficult to the extent we enter into professional and personal relationships with clients, opposing counsel and parties, judges and others involved in the legal process. In this eye-opening webinar, legal humorist Sean Carter will recount the tales of those lawyers who failed to meet this duty by creating the following entanglements: Entering into business transactions with clients Accepting gifts from clients; Accepting (or giving) loans; Romantic entanglements with clients; Friendships with judicial officers; Family and close relationships with opposing counsel/parties   SPEAKER:  Sean Carter is a Harvard Law grad, who spent a decade practicing securities law before leaving the practice of law to pursue a career as the country's foremost Humorist at Law.Since then, Mr. Carter has crisscrossed the country delivering comedic professional educational seminars for more than 350 legal organizations in three dozen states. His presentation topics run the gamut from legal ethics to stress management to diversity. Yet, all of his presentations have one thing in common -- humor and plenty of it.In fact, in 2003, Mr. Carter was dubbed "America's Funniest Lawyer" by The Radio and Television Interview Report.Finally, Sean lives in Mesa, Arizona with his wife and four sons.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/30/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Ethics in the Age of AI: Navigating the Legal Landscape with ChatGPT

$51.00
  • Instructor(s):  Cynthia Sharp, Becky Howlett

Ethics in the Age of AI: Navigating the Legal Landscape with ChatGPT In this essential CLE, lawyers Cynthia Sharp and Rebecca Howlett delve into the ethical complexities of using Gen AI tools like ChatGPT in legal practice. This course explores best practices for mitigating risks related to accuracy, over-reliance and confidentiality while navigating the evolving legal landscape. Participants will review the implications of ABA Formal Op. 512 - Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (issued July 29, 2024), along with U.S. ethics decisions involving AI and bar association guidance. The program also covers ethical duties of competence, communication, and supervision, along with issues like AI in the judiciary, plagiarism, and unauthorized practice of law. Learning Objectives: Avoid Gen AI ethical pitfalls related to over-reliance, inaccuracy, and confidentiality. Review the implications of ABA Formal Op. 512 - Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools on maintaining ethical practice of law. Understand the impact of U.S. ethics decisions involving AI use on duties of competence (MRPC 1.1). Explore how AI affects duties of communication, confidentiality, and supervision (MRPC 1.4, 1.6, 5.1, 5.3). Examine emerging issues such as plagiarism, unauthorized practice of law, and the future role of AI in the legal profession.   AGENDA :00 - :15 Scrutiny of possible pitfalls of using ChatGPT including inaccuracy and overreliance. Tips on how to address these issues will be included. Introductory overview of ethical implications of AI use in the legal field  :16 - :30 Beware “halluCITATIONS” Survey & analysis of U.S. ethics opinions related to AI use Discussion of ABA Formal Op. 512 - Generative AI Tools Duty of competence (MRPC 1.1) :31 - :45 Duty of communication - transparency required (MRPC 1.4) How to comply with duty of confidentiality (MRPC 1.6) Compliance with duty to supervise lawyers and non-lawyers (MRPC 5.1 and 5.3) Overview of bar association Gen AI guidance  :46 - :60 Overview of bar association Gen AI guidance (cont.) AI trends in the judiciary Other relevant issues: unauthorized practice of law, plagiarism, copyright infringement and defamation The Future of AI in the legal setting -- Will AI replace lawyers?       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/16/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Indemnity Agreements, in Business and Commercial Transactions: Types and Tradeoffs

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  Joel R. Buckberg & William J. Kelly, III

Indemnity Agreements, in Business and Commercial Transactions: Types and Tradeoffs Indemnity agreements are central to the risk allocation and limitation of liability system built into most transactionalarrangements. The indemnitor agrees to indemnify the indemnitee on the occurrence of certain events. The scope of liability in these agreements is very carefully defined, often including actual costs but excluding consequential damages or any damages arising from third-party claims. All of the pieces of the indemnity puzzle – scope, measure of damages, exclusions and procedures for cost recovery – must be very carefully considered, negotiated and drafted. This program will provide you with a practical guide to drafting key provisions of indemnity agreements in transactional agreements.  Scope of indemnity – indemnity v. hold harmless, damages v. liabilities, direct v. third-party claims Types of losses subject to indemnity – breaches of reps and warranties, covenants, losses, specific circumstances Determining recoverable damages and costs, including attorneys’ fees Implied or equitable indemnity – and use of disclaimers to limit liability Difference between the duty to defend v. indemnification  Procedure for claiming and obtaining indemnification reimbursements   Speakers: Joel R. Buckberg is a shareholder in the Nashville office of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. and chair of the firm’s commercial transactions and business consulting group. He has more than 45 years’ experience structuring and drafting commercial, corporate and business transactions.  He also counsels clients on strategic planning, financing, mergers and acquisitions, system policy and practice development, regulatory compliance and contract system drafting. Prior to joining Baker Donelson, he was executive vice president and deputy general counsel of Cendant Corporation.   William J. Kelly, III is a founding member of Kelly Law Partners, LLC, and has more than 30 years’ experience in the areas of employment and commercial litigation.  In the area of employment law, he litigates trade secret, non-compete, infringement and discrimination claims in federal and state courts nationwide and has advised Fortune 50 companies on workplace policies and practices.  In the area of commercial litigation, his experience includes class action litigation, breach of contract and indemnity, mass-claim complex insurance litigation, construction litigation and trade secrets.  Earlier in career, he founded 15 Minutes Music, an independent music production company.        Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/21/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Keep Your Hands Out of the Client's Cookie Jar: Avoiding Trust Accounting Violations

$50.00
  • Instructor(s):  Sean Carter

Keep Your Hands Out of the Client's Cookie Jar: Avoiding Trust Accounting Violations One of the fundamental principles of legal ethics can be summed up as: "Keep your hands off the money." And while this is a gross oversimplification of the legal ethics rules, it is true that this breach of fiduciary trust is among the gravest transgressions that a lawyer can make. Moreover, as it are often amongst the most heavily-punished violations, it often start a cascading effect of rule-breaking as lawyers desperately attempt to avoid detection. As a result, it never hurts to review this all-important ethical limitation on lawyer conduct. In this laugh-out-loud funny webinar, legal humorist Sean Carter will go through the ins and outs of avoiding trust account violations, specifically as it applies to: Stealing (and "borrowing") client funds Retaining funds that rightfully belong to others Using undue influence to inherit client wealth Diverting fees from one's law partners Premature withdrawal of earned fees   SPEAKER:  Sean Carter is a Harvard Law grad, who spent a decade practicing securities law before leaving the practice of law to pursue a career as the country's foremost Humorist at Law.Since then, Mr. Carter has crisscrossed the country delivering comedic professional educational seminars for more than 350 legal organizations in three dozen states. His presentation topics run the gamut from legal ethics to stress management to diversity. Yet, all of his presentations have one thing in common -- humor and plenty of it.In fact, in 2003, Mr. Carter was dubbed "America's Funniest Lawyer" by The Radio and Television Interview Report.Finally, Sean lives in Mesa, Arizona with his wife and four sons.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/28/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Learning Legal Ethics From the Lincoln Lawyer

$51.00
  • Instructor(s):  Philip Bogdanoff, Esq.

Learning Legal Ethics From the Lincoln Lawyer The first season of the Lincoln Lawyer series was the most popular English-language Netflix show having made the Top 10 in 90 countries.  Although everyone enjoyed watching the exploits of the Lincoln Lawyer, Mickey Haller, was he ethical?  The goal of this program is for attorneys to review the Rules of Professional Conduct while discussing this fascinating seriesTo do so, we will use film clips to examine Haller’s conduct , and determine whether he violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct:               Rule 1.1 Competence of Counsel,               Rule 1.2, Allocation of Authority Between a Client and Lawyer,               Rule 1.6, Confidentiality of Information, and               Rule 3.3, Candor Toward the Tribunal.    Attendees have described Mr. Bogdanoff’s presentations as “entertaining, engaging, informative, and helpful.”   Speaker:  Philip Bogdanoff is a nationally recognized continuing legal education speaker on the topics of ethics, professionalism, and other related topics. Previously, as an attorney, he served as assistant prosecutor in the Summit County, Ohio Prosecutor’s Office for more than 25 years, beginning in 1981. Mr. Bogdanoff argued cases before the Ohio Ninth District Court of Appeals and twenty cases before the Ohio Supreme Court including six death penalty cases - before retiring as a senior assistant prosecutor. He is the author of numerous articles on ethics, professionalism and other related legal topics and has taught the members of numerous organizations including the National Association of Legal Administrators, as well as numerous state and local Bar associations, Prosecuting Attorney's Associations, and law firms. More information about Mr. Bogdanoff is available on his Web site at http://www.philipbogdanoff.com/.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials. 

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/21/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Learning Legal Ethics From the Lincoln Lawyer, Season Two

$51.00
  • Instructor(s):  Philip Bogdanoff, Esq.

Learning Legal Ethics From the Lincoln Lawyer, Season Two In season two, the Lincoln Lawyer, Mickey Haller, develops aromantic relationship with the owner of a Mexican restaurant, Lisa Trammel. He learns she is feuding with a developer who is attempting to take her property.The developer files a restraining order against Ms. Trammel and is subsequently murdered. When Ms. Trammel is charged with this Murder, the Lincoln Lawyer springs into action to defend his new client against a confident prosecutor, Andrea Freeman, who relishes the thought of beating the Lincoln Lawyer attrial.   Attendees will watch film clips from this series to examine Haller’s and Freeman’s conduct and determine whether they violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, including:     • Rule 1.8 Conflict of Interest.     • Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.     • Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel. Attendees have described Mr. Bogdanoff’s presentation of the Lincoln Lawyer as “fantastic, entertaining, useful and awesome.”   Speaker:  Philip Bogdanoff is a nationally recognized continuing legal education speaker on the topics of ethics, professionalism, and other related topics. Previously, as an attorney, he served as assistant prosecutor in the Summit County, Ohio Prosecutor’s Office for more than 25 years, beginning in 1981. Mr. Bogdanoff argued cases before the Ohio Ninth District Court of Appeals and twenty cases before the Ohio Supreme Court including six death penalty cases - before retiring as a senior assistant prosecutor. He is the author of numerous articles on ethics, professionalism and other related legal topics and has taught the members of numerous organizations including the National Association of Legal Administrators, as well as numerous state and local Bar associations, Prosecuting Attorney's Associations, and law firms. More information about Mr. Bogdanoff is available on his Web site at http://www.philipbogdanoff.com/.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials. 

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/21/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

LIVE REPLAY: Ethics of Beginning and Ending Client Relationships

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  Elizabeth Treubert Simon

LIVE REPLAY: Ethics of Beginning and Ending Client Relationships Substantial ethics issues flow from the moment an attorney-client relationship is formed, whether it is formed intentionally or through inadvertence.  Determining when a relationship commences and the scope of the representation has dramatic implications for issues related to confidentiality, conflicts of interest, the attorney-client privilege and more. Ending an engagement is nearly as complicated. When are you allowed to end an engagement?  And how must you go about it without prejudicing a client’s interest in a transaction or in litigation? This program will you provide a real-world guide the ethical issues of beginning and ending an attorney client relationship. Determining when and how a relationship starts – including through inadvertence Email and technology issues – how unsolicited communications may trigger ethical obligations Joint representation issues – unsorting the confidentiality and privilege issues End a relationship – when are you allowed to end an engagement?  How do you do it ethically? Circumstances when you might be required to end a relationship   Speaker: Elizabeth Treubert Simon is an ethics attorney in the Washington, D.C. office of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, where she advises on a wide range of ethics and compliance-related matters to support Akin Gump’s offices worldwide.  Previously, her practice focused on business and commercial litigation and providing counsel to clients regarding professional ethics and attorney disciplinary procedures.  She is a member of the New York State Bar Association Committee on Professional Discipline and the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct Rules Review Committee.  She is the immediate past chair of the District of Columbia Legal Ethics Committee.  She writes and speaks extensively on attorney ethics issues.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 12/30/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

LIVE REPLAY: Lawyer Ethics and Email

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  Thomas E. Spahn

LIVE REPLAY: Lawyer Ethics and Email Email has become essential to law practice.  Communications with clients and colleagues is practically impossible – and absolutely inefficient – without email.  But the ubiquity of email may obscure many important ethical issues that arise when it is used in law practice, including issues related to confidentiality, metadata, and the attorney-client privilege. These and other substantial ethical questions will be discussed in this practical guide to the ethical issues when lawyers use email in their practices. Beginning an attorney relationship via email – intentionally and inadvertently Security and confidentiality when email is exchanged in the Cloud Inadvertently sent email and metadata embedded in email Discarding/deleting email and working with outside vendors Ex parte communications with represented adversaries Attorney-client privilege issues Speaker: Thomas E. Spahn is a partner in the McLean, Virginia office of McGuireWoods, LLP, where he has a substantial practice advising clients on properly creating and preserving the attorney-client privilege and work product protections.  For more than 30 years he has lectured extensively on legal ethics and professionalism and has written “The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Doctrine: A Practitioner’s Guide,” a 750-page treatise published by the Virginia Law Foundation.  Mr. Spahn has served as a member of the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility and as a member of the Virginia State Bar's Legal Ethics Committee.         Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.  

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 2/27/27
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

LIVE REPLAY: Service Level Agreements in Technology Contracting

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  Peter J. Kinsella

Service Level Agreements in Technology Contracting In a world where every client depends on IT functions – web site hosting, e-commerce, telecom, storing files remotely in the Cloud, or on locally leased servers, e-mail and much more – and when most of these functions are outsourced or provided by vendors, Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are of paramount importance. SLAs set benchmarks for these services – what uptime is expected and for how long, what happens when something goes down, how is service measured and reported?  The operation of every business and every law firm rests on the answer to these questions. This program will provide you a practical guide to reviewing, drafting and negotiating SLAs for client IT functions.  Purpose of SLAs – ensuring clients get benefit of bargain, incentivizing providers Types of services – locally installed v. the Cloud Service availability – uptime, guarantees, exclusions Service performance – minimum v. expected service, resolution time v. resolution goals Special considerations when drafting for the Cloud Common failures, damages, and remedies   Speaker: Peter J. Kinsella is a partner in the Denver office of Perkins Coie, LLP, where he has an extensive technology law practice focusing on advising start-up, emerging and large companies on technology-related commercial and intellectual property transaction matters.  Prior to joining his firm, he worked for ten years in various legal capacities with Qwest Communications International, Inc. and Honeywell, Inc.  Mr. Kinsella has extensive experience structuring and negotiating data sharing agreements, complex procurement agreements, product distribution agreements, OEM agreements, marketing and advertising agreements, corporate sponsorship agreements, and various types of patent, trademark and copyright licenses.  Mr. Kinsella received his B.S. from North Dakota State University and his J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 7/15/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

May It Displease the Court? Keeping Your Head (and Your Law License) in Court

$50.00
  • Instructor(s):  Sean Carter

May It Displease the Court? Keeping Your Head (and Your Law License) in Court In this hilarious webinar, legal humorist Sean Carter reviews some of the most outrageous breaches of lawyer decorum in recent years as they relate to: Intemperature courtroom outbursts Aggressive actions towards other parties/counsel Improper ex-parter communications Social media faux paus Unjustified criticism in pleadings Judicial election misconduct Disrespect for disciplinary authorities   SPEAKER: Sean Carter is a Harvard Law grad, who spent a decade practicing securities law before leaving the practice of law to pursue a career as the country's foremost Humorist at Law.Since then, Mr. Carter has crisscrossed the country delivering comedic professional educational seminars for more than 350 legal organizations in three dozen states. His presentation topics run the gamut from legal ethics to stress management to diversity. Yet, all of his presentations have one thing in common -- humor and plenty of it.In fact, in 2003, Mr. Carter was dubbed "America's Funniest Lawyer" by The Radio and Television Interview Report.Finally, Sean lives in Mesa, Arizona with his wife and four sons.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/13/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Responding to Demand Letters: Tone and Substance

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  William J. Kelly, III

Responding to Demand Letters: Tone and Substance Responding to a demand letter is as tricky as issuing a demanding letter.  There are issues of getting the substance right and getting the tone right.  How time do you spend researching the law and laying out your case?  How much do you disclose about your favorable facts? Is your goal settlement and, if so, how does that impact the tone of your letter?  Do you know enough about the letter writer and his or her client to gauge their likely reaction to your response?  And when do you respond – right away, by any deadline given, or do you wait?  These and many other questions will be addressed in this practical discussion of the tradeoffs of responding to demand letters.  Goals – do you want settlement or to make it go away – or are you preparing for litigation?  Law – how much do you research and push back? Tone – are you assertive, making counter-demands, or conciliatory? Facts – How much of what you know do you lay out? Timing – responding right away, by a deadline in the demand, or later?   Speaker: William J. Kelly, III is a founding member of Kelly Law Partners LLC and has nearly 30 years’ experience in the areas of employment and commercial litigation. In the area of employment law, he litigates trade secret, non-compete, infringement and discrimination claims in federal and state courts nationwide and has advised Fortune 50 companies on workplace policies and practices.  In the area of commercial litigation, his experience includes class action litigation, breach of contract and indemnity, mass-claim complex insurance litigation, construction litigation and trade secrets.  Earlier in career, he founded 15 Minutes Music, an independent music production company.  Mr. Kelly earned his B.A. from Tulane University and his J.D. from St. Louis University School of Law.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials. 

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/14/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Shared Spaces: Ethics of Remote and Virtual Offices

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  Thomas E. Spahn

Shared Spaces: Ethics of Remote and Virtual Offices Technology allows lawyers far more flexibility to practice law than ever before.  Lawyers can work in shared offices, splitting expenses with other small firms or solo practitioners. They can work remotely, from home or virtually anywhere, with basic computer and networking technology. But all these innovations come with ethics traps. These include issues of communications and confidentiality, supervising outsourced worked, multijurisdictional practice, and managing all the technology used to practice law from home.  This program will provide you with a practical guide to ethical issues when working from home or anywhere but a traditional office. Disclosure to clients of virtual nature of law office Duty of competence as a duty to understand technology Electronic communications, confidentiality, and ethical risks in virtual law offices How Web sites and a “virtual” presence implicate multijurisdictional practice issues Outsourcing work to paralegal services, including fee sharing issues   Speaker: Thomas E. Spahn is a partner in the McLean, Virginia office of McGuireWoods, LLP, where he has a broad complex commercial, business and securities litigation practice. He also has a substantial practice advising businesses on properly creating and preserving the attorney-client privilege and work product protections.  For more than 20 years he has lectured extensively on legal ethics and professionalism and has written “The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Doctrine: A Practitioner’s Guide,” a 750 page treatise published by the Virginia Law Foundation.  Mr. Spahn has served as member of the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility and as a member of the Virginia State Bar's Legal Ethics Committee.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/30/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

Subleases & Assignments in Commercial Real Estate, Part 1

$85.00
  • Instructor(s):  Michael P. Williams

Subleases & Assignments in Commercial Real Estate, Part 1 Subleasing and assignments are essential instruments for tenants to reduce the size and cost of their space as their needs change. Landlords (and their lenders) often disfavor subleases and assignments because they might lose control of who occupies the space. Subleases come in a variety of forms, all of which need to conform to the provisions of the master lease. Because of this, subleases can quickly become wildly complex, and have the potential to give rise to multiple levels of friction and possibly litigation. This program will provide you with a practical guide to the types of subleases and assignments, key issues for landlords, tenants, and subtenants, and drafting tips   Day 1 – March 27, 2024:             Subleasing v. assignments – when is each used or allowed?      Types of subleases – no reference to master leases, reference by incorporation, custom subleases      Standards of “reasonableness” in obtaining landlord consent to assignment or sublease      Identifying and mitigating risks to tenants and subtenants in subleasing           Landlord and lender concerns in subleases and methods to address   Day 2 – March 28, 2024:            Space recapture, profit sharing, and other landlord remedies     Restrictions on use in subleases and subtenant risks     Non-disturbance agreements with landlord and lender     Subtenant remedies when tenant defaults on master lease          Most important provisions of lease assignments   Speakers: Michael P. Williams is a partner in the Denver, Colorado office of Senn Visciano Canges, P.C., where he has extensive experience in commercial leasing and tenant relations, acquisition and disposition of office, industrial, retail and multi-family properties, representing real estate professionals in disputes before their boards or in litigation, and advising homeowner associations.  He also assists lenders in pre-foreclosure workouts, foreclosures, loan modifications and servicing REO property needs.  He is a member of the banking law subcommittee of the ABA’s Business Law Section.  Mr. Williams received his B.A. from Colorado State University and his J.D. from the University of Denver College of Law.     Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials. 

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 3/27/26
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

The 2025 Ethy Awards

$100.00
  • Instructor(s):  Sean Carter

The 2025 Ethy Awards Each year, Hollywood celebrates the best performances in motion pictures at the Oscars. Well, each year, we note the worst ethics violations in the legal profession at the Ethys. Humorist Sean Carter will host the festivities and announce the award winners for: Worst Original Excuse Least Competent in a Legal Representation Best Courtroom Outburst Worst Love Scene Most Creative Billing Lifetime Achievement Award And much more ...In the process of recapping these egregious instances of unethical behavior, Mr. Carter will demonstrate how the rest of us can avoid more common ethical violations.   SPEAKER:  Sean Carter is a Harvard Law grad, who spent a decade practicing securities law before leaving the practice of law to pursue a career as the country's foremost Humorist at Law.Since then, Mr. Carter has crisscrossed the country delivering comedic professional educational seminars for more than 350 legal organizations in three dozen states. His presentation topics run the gamut from legal ethics to stress management to diversity. Yet, all of his presentations have one thing in common -- humor and plenty of it.In fact, in 2003, Mr. Carter was dubbed "America's Funniest Lawyer" by The Radio and Television Interview Report.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 120
    Min.
  • 5/17/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

The AI Edge: Enhancing Legal Practice with ChatGPT

$51.00
  • Instructor(s):  Cynthia Sharp, Becky Howlett

The AI Edge: Enhancing Legal Practice with ChatGPT Join attorneys Cynthia Sharp and Rebecca Howlett in this practical and insightful CLE exploring how ChatGPT can transform legal practice. The course covers this Generative AI tool's capabilities, practical applications like document analysis and legal research, and how it can enhance attorney productivity. Learn how to mindfully use AI to streamline workflows and promote attorney well-being. Participants will experience a live, in-depth demonstration of ChatGPT in a legal setting, reviewing best practices, prompt engineering, and potential pitfalls such as misinformation and over-reliance.  Learning Objectives: Understand the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT in the legal setting. Learn practical, creative ways to streamline all areas of your law practice with Gen AI, including document review, marketing, and more. Identify best practices and strategies to mitigate risks like “hallucinations” and inaccurate information when using AI. Explore how leveraging AI can improve attorney well-being through enhanced workflow management and reduced workload.   AGENDA :00 - :15 Overview of ChatGPT and discussion of its capabilities and limitations  Various ways ChatGPT can be used in legal practice, including document analysis, contract review, and legal research Evolution of ChatGPT  :16 - :30 Leveraging ChatGPT in the Legal Field - Practical examples as to how ChatGPT can help attorneys streamline their work, save time, and reduce errors. Legal Specific AI Resources Explanation of prompt engineering & best prompts How mindfully leveraging technology such as ChatGPT can help promote attorney wellbeing 31 - :45  Live in-depth demonstration of ChatGPT use in legal setting :46 - :60 ChatGPT best practices Scrutiny of possible pitfalls of using ChatGPT including issues related to bias and accuracy.  Tips on how to address these issues will be included.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 60
    Min.
  • 5/15/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS
Course1

The Final Transaction: Hands-On A.I. Training for the Transactional Lawyer

$150.00
  • Instructor(s):  Sean Carter

The Final Transaction: Hands-On A.I. Training for the Transactional Lawyer The Final Transaction is a three-hour interactive mission for transactional attorneys ready to explore strange new tech to seek out smarter workflows and faster closings to boldly draft where no lawyer has drafted before! Join this hands-on voyage through the galaxy of A.I. tools that can turbocharge your due diligence, supercharge your negotiations, and draft contracts at warp speed. You'll get practical demonstrations, real-life applications, and enough tips and tricks to make even the most skeptical lawyer say, "Make it so." Engage your inner legal tech captain and prepare for a practice-transforming experience. In this program, you will learn: How to identify and evaluate AI tools that can assist with due diligence in transactional matters. Methods for using AI to review and analyze corporate documents for potential risks and red flags. Techniques for drafting and revising deal documents using generative AI tools. Approaches to using AI for analyzing and preparing responses to contract negotiation points. Ethical considerations involved in using AI in transactional practice, including issues related to confidentiality, supervision, and professional competence. Practical strategies for integrating AI into everyday workflows to improve efficiency and accuracy in transactional legal work. SPEAKER:  Sean Carter is a Harvard Law grad, who spent a decade practicing securities law before leaving the practice of law to pursue a career as the country's foremost Humorist at Law.Since then, Mr. Carter has crisscrossed the country delivering comedic professional educational seminars for more than 350 legal organizations in three dozen states. His presentation topics run the gamut from legal ethics to stress management to diversity. Yet, all of his presentations have one thing in common -- humor and plenty of it.In fact, in 2003, Mr. Carter was dubbed "America's Funniest Lawyer" by The Radio and Television Interview Report.Finally, Sean lives in Mesa, Arizona with his wife and four sons.       Disclaimer:  All views or opinions expressed by any presenter during the course of this CLE is that of the presenter alone and not an opinion of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the employers, or affiliates of the presenters unless specifically stated. Additionally, any materials, including the legal research, are the product of the individual contributor, not the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Bar Association makes no warranty, express or implied, relating to the accuracy or content of these materials.

  • Webcast
    Format
  • 180
    Min.
  • 5/20/25
    Presented
  • DETAILS